近日，辽宁大学校长余淼杰教授在马来亚大学发表的“理解中国高质量发展战略”公开演讲，在马来西亚引发了强烈的反响。马来西亚三大主流华文媒体——《星洲日报》《南洋商报》与《中国报》，以及当地最具影响力的英文媒体《星报》（The Star）集体对此次讲座进行重磅报道。

面对现场政要与精英，余淼杰教授深刻剖析了中国经济从“重速度”向“重质量”转型的底层逻辑，向海外清晰而有力地传递了中国跨越“中等收入陷阱”、构建高质量发展新格局的战略定力与实践路径。

现将报道原文转载如下：

A new view: Prof Yu says China’s development story needs to be understood through shifts in productivity, industrial composition, and technological capability. — Handout

Rethinking China’s growth

CHINA’S economic development story was defined in the past few decades by how fast it has grown, but the country is now looking beyond quick growth and moving towards prioritising adaptation, signalling a shift in priorities.

That shift in priorities was the focus of Prof Yu Miaojie’s public lecture – jointly organised by Malaysia-China Business Council and Bank of China (Malaysia) Bhd – at Universiti Malaya’s Kongzi Institute recently, where the president of Liaoning University in China unpacked the thinking behind Beijing’s evolving economic playbook.

Speaking to an audience of about 100 people including policymakers, academics, students and other guests – such as Deputy Finance Minister Liew Chin Tong, Malaysia-China Business Council chairman Tan Sri Datuk Low Kian Chuan, Bank of China CEO Wu Jun and Petaling Jaya MP Lee Chean Chung – Prof Yu framed China’s transition as one rooted in structural upgrading rather than sheer expansion.

Prof Yu spoke to an audience of about 100 people including Deputy Finance Minister Liew Chin Tong, Malaysia-China Business Council chairman Tan Sri Datuk Low Kian Chuan, Bank of China CEO Wu Jun and Petaling Jaya MP Lee Chean Chung.

The professor argued that China’s development story can no longer be understood purely through growth rates but must be looked at through the lens of shifts in productivity, industrial composition and technological capability.

“This is the key to avoiding falling into the middle-income trap ... and that is why China cares so much about this,” he said.

He then outlined a framework for understanding China’s high-quality development, pointing to the pillars that are innovation, green development and coordination, among others.

He described innovation as the most important driving force behind China’s next phase of growth. In 2025, China’sR&Dintensity was 2.8% and had overtaken the average R&D intensity of OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development) countries, which was 2.7%, Prof Yu said.

However, he acknowledged that gaps remain when compared with leading economies such as the United States, which had an R&D intensity of 3.5% last year.

Prof Yu also highlighted the distinction between two types of innovation, product R&D and process R&D, noting that each requires different levels of investment and institutional support.

“This comparison is important. Why? Because only when we understand the difference are we able to know which ways are appropriate to do that.”

For example, product innovation, which he described as going from zero to one, might not be suitable for a small company with limited funds to handle.

“It’s just not realistic. Therefore, from zero to one, if you want to get a good thing, then maybe you need to have organised research, which means that the government will play a key role there,” he said.

Beyond innovation, Prof Yu pointed to structural changes to China’s trade and industrial landscape as evidence of its shift towards higher-quality growth.

“The most important feature of processing trade is its low productivity,” he said, explaining that China has gradually moved away from this model towards higher value-added “ordinary trade”.

This transition, he added, reflects deeper domestic capabilities and a stronger position within global value chains.

“After 2001, the quality of Chinese products increased more than one-quarter, so this is very significant indeed,” he said, pointing to sustained improvements following China’s entry into the World Trade Organisation.

Productivity gains at the business level have also been significant since 2001, with Prof Yu saying that Chinese firms have almost doubled their productivity when compared with two decades ago. China’s broad industrial base is another defining feature of its economy, he added.

“According to the [UN’s] Standard International Trade Classification, China has covered all industries with the two-digit classification.”

(This means China produces goods across every major economic sector rather than specialising in just a few; ie, it has a highly diversified industrial base.)

“This is why we see that the Chinese manufacturing sector is so powerful today,” added Prof Yu.

Still, high-quality development is not just about production. Prof Yu underscored the importance of coordination, particularly between urbanisation and industrialisation, to ensure balanced growth, as neither can grow sustainably without the other.

“Many people move to the city; this is called urbanisation, but they cannot find a job because they do not have industrialisation. Then suddenly you’ve got a slum, and once you’ve got a slum, this will affect your social stability, and in the end, that’s very bad for the country.

“On the other hand, if you look at some regions where industrialisation is very high but urbanisation is low, you’ve got a very strong labour demand but you do not have a labour supply because not many people go there to work.”

Currently, China has slightly higher industrialisation, which is why, Prof Yu said, the Chinese government is trying to increase urbanisation to keep pace.

Green development is another key pillar, with China placing increasing emphasis on sustainability and environmental protection. Referring to the country’s goal of achieving carbon neutrality by 2060, Prof Yu pointed out that China only has 30 years to go to meet the target: “This is not easy, but still China is trying to keep its promise for sure,” he said.

He noted that China’s approach prioritises building new energy capacity before phasing out older sources.

“You increase the new energy and then once it’s successful, you reduce the traditional sources and so on,” he said.

Ultimately, Prof Yu said that economic development is not an end in itself but a means to improve people’s livelihoods.

“Certainly economic growth is not the objective. Development and also people’s living standard increases are our final objectives.”

As China moves into a new phase of its economic trajectory, its focus on quality over speed signals a broader recalibration, one that seeks to balance growth with resilience, sustainability and mutual prosperity.